As detailed in this blog post, there was a previously unaddressed problem with using baluns back to back in a test setup, with a VNA for example. The problem was that the baluns did not have isolation, which would cause a signal input to one differential port to show up at the other differential port. This would cause a resonance in the S parameters, and an ‘echo’ in the time domain behavior of the balun.
Starting now, this problem is a thing of the past. Marki Microwave just released a new line of ‘Isolation Baluns’. These are baluns built using a through line and an inverter, as has been sold before, but with a Wilkinson power divider between them. As I showed in this blog post, a Wilkinson power divider is capable of splitting data. It is also capable of combining data, so long as the data is common mode (identical on each arm). This is the circumstance with the new baluns, when placed back to back.
The isolation of this new balun structure means that the two baluns can be placed back to back and attached to a VNA to extend the measurement capability of a two port VNA to differential devices.
Previously this would cause an insertion loss ripple, like this:
With two back to back isolation baluns, however, the insertion loss ripple is solved:
As you can see in this second plot taken with back to back baluns there is very little ripple in the insertion loss, vs. the large ripple in the insertion loss of the back to back baluns in the case with no isolation. Additionally, the return loss does not exhibit the same high values, for the same reason.
This effect can be seen in the time domain as well. When two non-isolation baluns are placed back to back, a step echo can be seen in the oscilloscope trace of a square wave input:
The top trace here is the input, and the bottom trace is the output of two back to back baluns without isolation (not to scale). Compare this with the effect when two isolation baluns are placed back to back:
In this case there is minimal distortion from the back to back baluns. Here are the two output traces next to each other, just to reinforce the point:
This implies that these isolation baluns can be used to extend a 2 port VNA to differential testing simply by de-embedding the S-parameters of the back to back baluns, something that was not possible before. This is something that we are still working on, but I will write an update when we have an exact procedure.
[…] In conclusion, I think that these distinctions may be valid and meaningful for low frequency baluns used in amateur radio setups, but for high speed test baluns the most useful metric is not voltage vs. current, but how much isolation is there? […]Leave a Comment
Nice post. How were you able to post screen captures from the scope like this? Very handy for blogging.
We have an Agilent 86100C, which makes it possible to save screen captures of the scope traces. We try to have a method to save electronic copies of all of our test data, otherwise we can’t share it with our customers!
Really useful post here.
You talked about de-embedding the S-Parameters of the back to back balun, but have not given any further detail. Have you been able to find a way to do this ?
Thank you and that is a good question. The main barrier to testing whether my de-embedding theory works is that I don’t have a differential to differential device to test yet. Unfortunately nothing that we sell meets this criteria. We are working on some devices that would be, so this may change soon.
I have a question regarding this back-to-back Balun connection. I have 2 BAL0026 (upto 26 GHz) Baluns connected back-to-back and my single ended input is say a 100mV (amplitude) sine-wave. I observe that my output single ended is now only 50 mV in amplitude. I observe that there is a directional loss of 6 dB from differential to single ended. Could you please explain this? The datasheet for BAL0026 shows that 2 -180 degree out of phase signals should add in phase to give double the amplitude.